The Supreme Court has overturned the Karnataka High Court's bail order for Darshan, emphasizing that popularity or influence does not grant special privileges under the law. The court underscored that justice must be equal for all.
The issue of Darshan, a prime accused in the Renukaswamy murder case, receiving preferential treatment in jail drew sharp criticism from the Supreme Court. On August 14, 2025, the court canceled the bail granted by the Karnataka High Court on December 13, 2024, to Darshan and four other accused, deeming it legally untenable. PALAY® Straw Hat Sun Hats for Women,Wide Brim Cap Beach Hat for Women Stylish UV Protection Cap,Summer Packable Travel Sun Visor Hat - UPF 50+
The Supreme Court condemned the special treatment Darshan received in jail and highlighted the risk of him misusing his popularity, political influence, and financial power to manipulate the legal process.What the Supreme Court Said:High Court’s Bail Order Invalid: The Karnataka High Court’s bail order for Darshan and others was deemed legally unsustainable.
Darshan Ineligible for Bail: Given his popularity, influence, and financial power, Darshan is not eligible for bail.
Risk to Judicial Process: Darshan’s social and political influence poses a risk of tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, or obstructing justice.
High Court Overlooked Case Severity: The High Court failed to adequately consider the gravity of the premeditated murder and its societal impact.
Medical Grounds Unjustified: The jail hospital is equipped to provide medical care, negating claims of requiring urgent treatment outside.
Misuse of Bail: After securing bail, Darshan attended social events, potentially attempting to influence witnesses.
Popularity Grants No Special Rights: Fame, wealth, or social status does not entitle anyone to preferential treatment under the law.
Wrong Message to Society: Granting bail in serious cases could send a misguided message and erode public trust in the judiciary.also read; Putin Extends Independence Day Greetings, Reaffirms Russia–India Strategic Partnership.
Flaws in High Court’s Order: The High Court did not properly examine phone records, CCTV footage, or Darshan’s role in the case.
Law Above All: The Supreme Court reaffirmed that no individual is above the law, and everyone must face justice equally.
The Supreme Court’s ruling sends a clear message: justice is impartial, and no one receives special privileges based on fame, power, or wealth. The High Court’s bail order for Darshan was legally flawed and has been quashed.