New Delhi: The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Central Government and the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding the voting rights of approximately 4.5 lakh undertrial prisoners, potentially sparking a significant debate in the country’s democratic framework.Safari Flip 32L Casual Printed Backpack, 2 Compartments, Bottle Holder, Front Pocket, School Bag for Boys and Girls, College Bag, Office Bag, Travel Bag for Men and Women

In a landmark move, the Supreme Court has directed the Centre and the ECI to provide their views on granting voting rights to around 4.5 lakh undertrial prisoners currently held in jails across India. This issue has ignited fresh discussions about the rights of undertrial prisoners within the democratic system.Also Read: Mysuru Balloon Seller Girl Rape-Murder Case: Pratap Simha Slams Government for Silence

A bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran heard arguments from advocate Prashant Bhushan, who contended that the blanket ban under Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951, violates constitutional guarantees and international democratic standards. The petition seeks the formulation of appropriate conditions to regulate the voting rights of prisoners rather than a complete prohibition.

The petitioners argue that the current absolute ban deprives a significant population of their voting rights. In the 1997 case of Anukul Kumar Pradhan vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court had upheld Section 62(5) as a statutory restriction. However, the current plea relies on the Anoop Baranwal judgment, which reaffirmed voting as a constitutional right.

The court’s directive marks a pivotal moment, and the responses from the Centre and ECI will be crucial in shaping the future of undertrial prisoners’ participation in India’s electoral process. The matter is expected to be further deliberated in upcoming hearings. For updates, refer to official court proceedings or credible news sources.