In a significant escalation in the Dharmasthala mass burial case, a First Information Report (FIR) has been filed against lawyer N. Manjunath for allegedly disseminating false information regarding the operations of the Special Investigation Team (SIT). The FIR, lodged at the Belthangadi police station based on a complaint by Raghurama Shetty, accuses Manjunath of spreading misleading details through a press release issued on July 30, 2025.Dharmasthala Case: Planned Conspiracy Unraveled, BJP Leader Sunil Kumar Officially Comments on X
Filed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, the charges claim that Manjunath’s actions caused public fear and confusion about the SIT’s investigation into the alleged mass burials in Dharmasthala.Manjunath, who represents Sujatha Bhat, the mother of the purportedly missing medical student Ananya Bhat, stated in his press release that items including a torn red blouse, a PAN card, and two ATM cards were recovered during exhumation at one of the burial sites.
However, SIT officials have firmly denied these claims, asserting that no such evidence was found at the specified locations. This contradiction has led to allegations that Manjunath intentionally fabricated the information to mislead the public and potentially obstruct the ongoing investigation, adding further complexity to an already sensitive case.Sujatha Bhat Confesses – “I have no daughter, I filed a false complaint. Considering my age, spare me from punishment” – Exclusive Interview
The Dharmasthala mass burial case gained widespread attention following claims by a former sanitation worker who alleged being coerced into burying multiple bodies between 1995 and 2014. The SIT, led by DGP Pronab Mohanty, is actively investigating these allegations, conducting exhumations at various sites identified by the whistleblower.
DUPATTA BAZAAR Women's White Linen Dupatta With Organza Border And Tassels, Free Size
The accusations against Manjunath have intensified concerns about the spread of misinformation, which threatens to undermine the integrity of the investigation. His press release, which conflicted with the SIT’s findings, is perceived as an attempt to manipulate public perception and create unnecessary speculation.
The FIR against Manjunath marks a pivotal moment in the case, highlighting the serious implications of spreading false narratives in high-stakes investigations. The SIT is expected to expand its probe to examine Manjunath’s motives and potential connections to others involved in disseminating misinformation, such as Girish Mattannavar and Jayanth T, previously implicated by Sujatha Bhat.Dharmasthala Mass Cremation Case: SIT Issues Notice to Sujatha Bhat..!
Authorities may pursue further legal action to ensure accountability and safeguard the investigation’s credibility.This development emphasizes the critical need for responsible communication in cases that evoke strong public emotions. The spread of false information, as exemplified by Manjunath’s actions, has fueled confusion and mistrust, underscoring the importance of verified facts.
As the SIT continues its investigation, further clarity is anticipated regarding the mass burial allegations and the roles of individuals involved, with the public and media awaiting updates to uncover the truth behind the Dharmasthala case.Sujatha Bhat’s Shocking Confession in Dharmasthala Case: Ananya Bhat Story Fabricated..!